Find the Flaw in this Argument
This is how the American Families Association reacted to the ruling by federal district court Judge Vaughan Walker that California’s Prop. 8 (banning same-sex marriage) violated the federal Constitution:
It’s also extremely problematic that Judge Walker is a practicing homosexual himself. He should have recused himself from this case, because his judgment is clearly compromised by his own sexual proclivity.
…whereas practicing heterosexuals have never been known to allow biases about their own sexual proclivity interfere with their tireless pursuit of equal justice for all? Hmmm.
Could any defense of the anti-gay agenda be more illustrative of its own failure to comprehend the meaning of equal protection of the law? It’s amazing that it’s even possible to be so oblivious to the fact that your own positions cannot withstand the very same criticisms you make against your opponents’.
Via Igor Volsky.
About Me
- I write this blog.
-
My twitter feed:
