Weekend Wordery: In Which I Humbly Admit I Was Wrong, Sort Of
I am loath to report that, contrary to all sense and logic in the universe, I was sort of wrong about attorneys general’s. It turns out I am not a very cunning linguist. But on the bright side, I am not half as stupid as the English-language convention according to which attorneys general’s is proper usage.
I say “sort of wrong” because, even though attorneys general’s does not violate grammatical rules in any formal sense, my style manual—Chicago, 14th ed.—specifically advises that such phrases be avoided and replaced by a prepositional phrase with of. Here’s the whole entry for possessives of compound nouns, § 6.22:
It is customary to form the possessive of all compound nouns, whether closed, open, or hyphenated, and of similar noun phrases by adding the inflection at the end of the compound or phrase:
cookbook’s
doctor of philosophy’s
daughter-in-law’s
the mayor of Chicago’sThe possessive of the plurals of compound nouns may be formed in the same way, but many of the resulting forms are awkward and might profitably be replaced by the possessive prepositional phrase with of:
cookbooks’
daughters-in-law’s or of the daughters-in-lawTo form the possessive of the plural of noun phrases, like the one illustrated above, it is best to use the construction with of and avoid the possessive inflection:
of the mayors of Chicago
the wives of the doctors in the amphitheater
When the “head noun” is at the left of the phrase, as in brother-in-law, the phrase is pluralized by adding -s to the head noun. But the possessive inflection ‘s goes at the end of the phrase—no matter what kind of word the phrase ends with—as in, alas, brothers-in-law’s. Also: You can borrow whoever finishes first’s pencil. Or They will ride in whomever your sisters-in-law’s friends are going with’s cars! And, yes:
The Attorneys General’s arguments are bogus.
Comments
One Response to “Weekend Wordery: In Which I Humbly Admit I Was Wrong, Sort Of”
Leave a Reply
About Me
- I write this blog.
-
My twitter feed:
[...] is wrong, as did Jim Hufford regarding the plural possessive of “attorney general.” He returns to this most pressing of grammatical issues and gets a little help from the 14th edition of the [...]